From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 12:41:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1813106564A for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458068FC08 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:41:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q5MCfuZG041722 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:41:56 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:41:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201206221241.q5MCfuZG041722@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Why Clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:41:38 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jun 21 12:46:15 2012 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:37:48 -0500 > From: Mark Felder > Cc: Wojciech Puchar > Subject: Re: Why Clang > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:36:03 -0500, Wojciech Puchar > wrote: > > > > > But why anyone from FreeBSD fundation didn't just write official letter > > to GNU "Free" Software Foundation asking for just that case? > > There needs to be a lawsuit and lawyers and judges need to be involved. > You can't just ask the FSF to "explain" themselves. You _can_ ask. The response just doesn't 'mean anything' -- the actual language of the 'license' takes precedence.