From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 21:00:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD60D16A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 21:00:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFF043D31 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 21:00:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E5BA572DBF; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 21:00:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42E272DB5; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 21:00:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 21:00:04 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040104205911.S77465@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Expensive timeout(9) function ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 05:00:05 -0000 On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > Hi, > > what reports do you expect with the > > "Expensive timeout(9) function" > > message ? Why do we see it ? You compiled your kernel with 'options DIAGNOSTIC'. Unless you have an explicit reason for doing so, you should not use this option. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org