Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 05:05:49 +0700 (NOVST) From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru> To: Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010240503290.24021-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20001023175332.B29365@electricjellyfish.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Garrett Rooney wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:49:40AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > Well, would not be this stepping aside from BSD startup sequence, which we > > all know and love? Having dozens of small files instead of pair of > > big ones always frustrates me when I have to work with linux. > > well, it's a single directory full of small files, as opposed to a bunch > of directories, each with its own collection of files, with ugly numbers > at the beginning of each one. that's better in my book. > > and at the very least, with a number of smaller files, assuming they're > named well, you can find what you're looking for faster, and not have > to dig though the one monolithic script to find out how sometihng is > working. Still, it would be better if I could choose between "classical" and "new" startup layout, say, somewhere at the installation stage. -- With best and kind regards, DAN Fe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.10.10010240503290.24021-100000>