From owner-freebsd-current Mon Dec 27 19:14:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (overcee.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8490C15304 for ; Mon, 27 Dec 1999 19:14:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9393C1CA0; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 11:14:45 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Matthew Dillon Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) In-Reply-To: Message from Matthew Dillon of "Mon, 27 Dec 1999 17:21:35 PST." <199912280121.RAA35049@apollo.backplane.com> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 11:14:45 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <19991228031445.9393C1CA0@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew Dillon wrote: [..] > And, in anycase, I am not going to spend hours putting together a long > involved patch when a simple short patch suffices. If you want to > spend the time to come up with your own patch (that doesn't screw the > pooch in regards to cluster performance!), then I'm all ears, otherwise > this patch is what is going to go in for the 4.0 release. Please hold fire for a bit longer. I have (what I think is) a much cleaner fix in mind. There is no urgency here, a couple of hours isn't going to make the slightest difference to the big picture. On a side note, as the original author of the changes that lead to this, I would have thought it would have been appropriate to ask ME directly first before going public. Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message