Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 10:26:36 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu> To: kelly@fsl.noaa.gov (Sean Kelly) Cc: lmcdefo@lmc.ericsson.se, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPP acts ODDLY (was Re: FreeBSD 2.0R + SLIP = crashes: the plot thickens) Message-ID: <199412221726.KAA27600@bsd.coe.montana.edu> In-Reply-To: kelly@fsl.noaa.gov (Sean Kelly) "Re: PPP acts ODDLY (was Re: FreeBSD 2.0R %2B SLIP = crashes: the plot thickens)" (Dec 22, 12:16pm)
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Nate> It works fine over SLIP for me. Are you *sure* your > Nate> clueless IP provider has their name resolvers setup > Nate> correctly? > > I can talk to name servers of the clueless and the clueful IP > providers from other IP-connected hosts OK, so I think the answer's > ``yes''. Hmm, right now on my box (IP # changed to protect the guilty) running 2.0. All my traffic goes throught the SLIP line. Script started on Thu Dec 22 11:07:47 1994 root:/root # ifconfig sl0 sl0: flags=9011<UP,POINTOPOINT,LINK0,MULTICAST> mtu 552 inet 153.90.192.1001 --> 153.90.192.0 netmask 0xffffff00 root:/root # cat /etc/resolv.conf ; ; BIND data file. ; domain coe.montana.edu nameserver 153.90.192.10 nameserver 153.90.2.1 nameserver 192.31.215.210 nameserver 128.95.120.1 root:/root # nslookup Default Server: pdq.coe.montana.edu Address: 153.90.192.10 > freefall.cdrom.com Server: pdq.coe.montana.edu Address: 153.90.192.10 Non-authoritative answer: Name: freefall.cdrom.com Address: 192.216.222.4 > root:/root # Script done on Thu Dec 22 11:08:15 1994 > Would their name servers be refusing to talk to their > anything coming from their own SLIP/PPP addresses, perhaps? I don't think that's possible, but who knows. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199412221726.KAA27600>