Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Apr 1996 07:00:29 -0700
From:      "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org>
To:        "Daniel M. Eischen" <deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org>
Cc:        asami@cs.berkeley.edu, scsi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Changing ID of 2940UW 
Message-ID:  <199604161400.HAA13388@freefall.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 16 Apr 1996 05:54:54 CDT." <9604161054.AA12799@iworks.InterWorks.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>When I was looking through the Adaptec PCI device probe I noticed you
>were only using anding the HBA device ID with 0x7 and stuffing it into
>SCSICONF and SCSICONF + 1.  Shouldn't it be anded with 0xf?

Not quite.  I sent Satoshi a different patch last night that uses
host_id in SCSICONF + 1 instead of scsi_conf which was what I'd intended
all along.  Bit 7 in SCSICONF is part of the selection timer setting
which is why you must and it with 0x7.  SCSICONF+1 is only referenced
if the device is wide, which is the only time ((host_id&0x7) != host_id)
can be true.  I'll commit it as soon as my SCB paging patches are
ready.

>Dan Eischen
>deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org

--
Justin T. Gibbs
===========================================
  FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations
===========================================



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604161400.HAA13388>