Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 01:34:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New ACPI diffs ready for testing Message-ID: <20030426013202.J3723@znfgre.qbhto.arg> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304250123180.64276-100000@root.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304250123180.64276-100000@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: > I have prepared two versions of ACPI for testing, one from the 0228 dist > and one from 0328. Both patches are against the current version in the > tree so you should be able to just "cd /usr/src; zcat *diff.gz | patch". > I have tested both pretty thoroughly on my laptop but need more testing > from others to decide which to import. Neither crash, but the 0328 dist > adds a lot more console messages complaining about my battery (see > separate message for more info on this.) > > http://www.root.org/~nate/freebsd/acpi-0228.diff.gz > http://www.root.org/~nate/freebsd/acpi-0328.diff.gz I just tested 0328 on my thinkpad a21e. I noticed two problems right away. First, I couldn't get battery status at all. Second, the following messages were scrolling by about once a second: ACPI-1284: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.ISA_.EC__.AC__._PSR] (Node 0xc25c2640), AE_NOT_EXIST ACPI-1284: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.ISA_.EC__.I2RB] (Node 0xc25c6c40), AE_NOT_EXIST ACPI-1284: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.ISA_.EC__.BAT0._BST] (Node 0xc25c42a0), AE_NOT_EXIST Sorry, I haven't had a chance to do all the debugging you asked for, I'm going to try and get to the other patch set first to see how much difference it makes. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030426013202.J3723>