Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 09:58:20 +0930 From: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>, "Matthew N. Dodd" <mdodd@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: libedit for Vinum (was: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/bc Makefile config.h) Message-ID: <20011021095820.G85563@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20011020045728.A87527@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.org on Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 04:57:28AM -0700 References: <200110190024.f9J0Odt26405@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0110182130090.71203-100000@sasami.jurai.net> <20011020045728.A87527@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, 20 October 2001 at 4:57:28 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:38:09PM -0400, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: >>> mdodd 2001/10/18 17:24:39 PDT >>> >>> Modified files: >>> gnu/usr.bin/bc Makefile config.h >>> Log: >>> Turn on the libedit support in bc. Turn off libreadline. >> >> The remaining in tree consumers of libreadline are: >> ... >> src/sbin/vinum > > These programs, being non-GPV'ed, would benefit from using libedit > rather than libreadline (unless Grog does not like libedit for > vinum). No, it's just laziness. kris sent me some patches long ago, but I didn't get round to looking at them. As long as they don't change the functionality, I don't have an issue with them. >> The changes to vinum are a little more involved Can somebody remind me why this is? There can't be more than a couple of lines involved in the original import of libreadline. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011021095820.G85563>