From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Mar 30 17: 2:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214BC37C26B for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:02:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e2V1RR203471; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:27:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:27:27 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Andrew MacIntyre Cc: Doug Barton , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 32 bit questions Message-ID: <20000330172727.A21029@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au on Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 06:45:38PM +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Andrew MacIntyre [000330 12:42] wrote: > On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Doug Barton wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > > FreeBSD can handle over 5000 cgi requests an hour > > > > *cough* My bank of CGI processing machines handle 2-3 per second, > > each. This is on dual PIII 500's with mega ram. > > > > :) > > 3600 seconds to the hour, so you're handling 7200-10800 per hour. > Methinks Alfred was being conservative..... Some of the cgi's I've seen are lucky if you can run them once per second, it really depends on the work that the CGI does, and how well it's been coded along with the exec model (fork+exec/fastcgi/module). Your milage may vary. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message