From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 2 10:49:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BFF106566B; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:49:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: from palm.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:613:100::211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598068FC15; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:49:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by palm.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 78EDF1CC73; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:49:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:49:06 +0100 From: Ed Schouten To: VANHULLEBUS Yvan Message-ID: <20100202104906.GO77705@hoeg.nl> References: <20100126200537.GJ77705@hoeg.nl> <20100127105212.23f15f50@ernst.jennejohn.org> <1e31c7981002011117p225d3447h43d3b3c7796c94e2@mail.gmail.com> <20100202104426.GA82116@zeninc.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="enbeIAqa8YisR7TD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100202104426.GA82116@zeninc.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Vinicius Abrahao Subject: Re: HEADS UP: gone. All welcome . X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:49:07 -0000 --enbeIAqa8YisR7TD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Yvan, * VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: > We're working on this, but as we have now to work with both utmp.h and=20 > utmpx.h (at least for FreeBSD releases and FreeBSD CURRENT), we're > trying to find a clean way to solve the issue. I think the cleanest solution would be to split them off completely. Most projects do things like: #define utmp utmpx but this really makes the code harder to interpret. Just moving all the utmp stuff into a small set of routines that you port per operating system is probably the best way to go. Greetings, --=20 Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ --enbeIAqa8YisR7TD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAktoAyIACgkQ52SDGA2eCwWmKwCdGKkSAGOK1/YZGFK74llAo0mf jPkAn2VpPZ/s0AgB2bn1zLzyRg8VXNK0 =snnT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --enbeIAqa8YisR7TD--