From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 2 23:29:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C8C16A41F for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 23:29:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F1843D4C for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 23:29:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jA2NVtb50547; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:31:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:29:03 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1931.217.37.3.201.1130935789.squirrel@www.orbweavers.co.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: New Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:29:12 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of >martin@orbweavers.co.uk >Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 4:50 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: New Logo > > > >I think the critism is a bit harsh. Any logo for FreeBSD is >going to be an >lossing battle - how do you please the beastie fans who don't want >anything radically different, >and those that want a more 'professional' >logo. Beastie is not an 'unprofessional' logo. >I think this logo does the job very well, Obviously. >all beastie fans can >immediatly recognise it for what it is, But, it's uglier than Beastie. Why trade away a good image of Beastie for an ugly one? >while someone who is >unaware (i.e. >the PHB) will only see it as a generic logo. > The folks that objected to Beastie are going to object to this one for the same reasons. It's red. It has horns. It must be of the Devil. My God, the wonderful Rush Limbaugh, says so. Ted