From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 13:27:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701DB16A4BF; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 13:27:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED30743FBD; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 13:27:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h84KR8P2017477; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 21:27:08 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h84KR82N017476; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 21:27:08 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h84KLwqi028730; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 21:21:58 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200309042021.h84KLwqi028730@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 04 Sep 2003 09:30:45 PDT." <20030904092737.H48157@znfgre.qbhto.arg> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 21:21:58 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_NO_LOWER,IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: Putinas cc: Mark Murray cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Entropy harvesting: interrupts ethernet point_to_point X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 20:27:11 -0000 Doug Barton writes: > I've seen this problem on my compaq evo n610c as well, but didn't > realize it was affecting other hardware as well. I tried to stir up > interest in getting the acpi problem fixed, but wasn't successful. Hmmm :-( > Mark, ok with you if I nuke the sysctl -a line in rc.d/initrandom? I > hate to lose that source (no matter how small), but if the "can't finish > sysctl -a" cancer is spreading... I'd really rather see sysctl fixed, rather than weakening Innocent Bystanders, but I'm not going to force this issue. So, reluctantly, yes, if you can't find a better place to hack a fix. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH