From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Mar 25 9:50:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from riker.skynet.be (riker.skynet.be [195.238.3.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1596F37B422 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 09:50:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.8] (ip-27.shub-internet.org [194.78.144.27] (may be forged)) by riker.skynet.be (8.11.6/8.11.6/Skynet-OUT-2.16) with ESMTP id g2PHnvr00149; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 18:49:57 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from ) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: bs663385@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3C9F1EF6.CB28EDD7@mindspring.com> References: <20020323002608.B20699@rain.macguire.net> <3C9C84CF.2090300@flash.net> <20020323084327.A354@rain.macguire.net> <3C9DF87D.5050306@cream.org> <000c01c1d3ab$6d2c6960$6600a8c0@penguin> <3C9F1EF6.CB28EDD7@mindspring.com> X-Grok: +++ath X-WebTV-Stationery: Standard; BGColor=black; TextColor=black Reply-By: Wed, 1 Jan 1984 12:34:56 +0100 X-Message-Flag: Outlook : A program to spread viri via e-mail. Try Eudora (http://www.eudora.com/), mutt (http://www.mutt.org/), or pine (http://www.washington.edu/pine/). But please, get something other than Outlook. Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 18:34:43 +0100 To: Terry Lambert , Dag-Erling Smorgrav From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: qmail (Was: Maintaining Access Control Lists ) Cc: Taylor Dondich , chat@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 4:58 AM -0800 2002/03/25, Terry Lambert wrote: > Wedging per domain mail queues into Postfix is much harder > than wedging them into sendmail. They are almost natural > in sendmail (well, older versions of sendmail; the newer > stuff breaks a lot of intersting things by putting security > barriers in the way). Per-domain mail queues is one of the few things that Wietse had yet to support in postfix as of the last time I did anything with it. I believe that it was something added soon thereafter, but I haven't been able to confirm that. > If you do wedge them in, then on an ETRN/ATRN, you are > guaranteed a 100% hit rate on queue messages, instead of > just the percentage of the main queue of the messages for > a particular domain. Indeed, that is a problem. And if you get 50-60 ETRN requests per second (as our business-class mail server was getting), this causes untold amounts of unholy hell. -- Brad Knowles, Do you hate Microsoft? Do you hate Outlook? Then visit the Anti-Outlook page at and see how much fun you can have. "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message