From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 14:21:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2711106566B for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:21:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CED08FC13 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenq3 with SMTP id q3so895294yen.13 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:21:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=vhKCb3S8HxBP9x7+3VH5Q3BEXWhPmDq85BdOf7PHMns=; b=S/AsQgNj0AD4ZvGqgWYPcJA750kNbT8z9ArIu0IeX7fte40SmEVf1aZKyoHq4wrsq+ F5uhmZBD+uKMqgj7XRHatHBSk6qMDfbiqMdnibWi4BTCnHVxmDV8P+1/hYQcA+xsZ7cF 8egemRTty97ywwOkYirWcjQy7bynjEq8lA+kc= Received: by 10.236.161.197 with SMTP id w45mr23705777yhk.96.1326810095219; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:21:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ivoras@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.250.7 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:20:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1326756727.23485.10.camel@Arawn> <4F14BAA7.9070707@freebsd.org> <20120117010239.GA29529@richh-imac.office.boxdice.com.au> From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:20:54 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: twZdY-E5taAfs76aU68Mq4hGa5U Message-ID: To: Igor Mozolevsky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:21:36 -0000 On 17 January 2012 14:49, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: > On 17 January 2012 13:44, Ivan Voras wrote: >> On 17/01/2012 07:32, Atom Smasher wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, richo wrote: >>> >>>> This would be a different argument if all the devs were paid a salary. >>> >>> ============== >>> >>> what percentage of linux devs are on salary to develop linux? >> >> Apparently, 3/4: http://apcmag.com/linux-now-75-corporate.htm > > Actually, you're misrepresenting the facts: according to the headline, > 75% of the code came from paid developers, *not* 75% of developers are > paid... See the difference?.. Yes, you're correct.