From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sat Sep 28 16:33:03 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB7012AF7B
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 28 Sep 2019 16:33:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
 (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46gZ333LJ1z4NP1
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 16:33:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org)
Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354)
 id 6A982F2D8; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 16:33:03 +0000 (UTC)
From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: make.conf for a poudriere jail and CPUTYPE
References: <20190928135343.GE49516@bastion.zyxst.net>
 <r240-cxo8-wny@FreeBSD.org> <20190928145055.GF49516@bastion.zyxst.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 18:32:59 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20190928145055.GF49516@bastion.zyxst.net>
 (tech-lists@zyxst.net's message of "Sat, 28 Sep 2019 15:50:55 +0100")
Message-ID: <y2y8-bcuc-wny@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 16:33:03 -0000

tech-lists <tech-lists@zyxst.net> writes:

> On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 04:17:43PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote:
>
>>tech-lists <tech-lists@zyxst.net> writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:33:36PM +0100, tech-lists wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> If I'm building ports on a poudriere and the jail I'm building for has say
>>>> Host CPU: btver1 and the host running poudriere is Host CPU: sandybridge, is
>>>> there any benefit or advantage in defining CPUTYPE?= in the jail's make.conf?
>>>>
>>>> If yes, which programs does it benefit? I guess maybe openssl
>>>
>>> thought I'd experiment. Seems setting CPUTYPE?=btver1 causes some ports to
>>> fail at the configure or build stage. python36 and lzo2 for example. Unsure
>>> why that should be (or where to ask???)
>>
>>I can't reproduce. Provide poudriere log which documents FreeBSD
>>version, compiler type/version/flags, port options, make.conf, etc.
>
> Ok, for archivers/lzo2:
> https://cloud.zyxst.net/~john/FreeBSD/ports/buildfailures/lzo2-2.10_1.log

Compare with http://beefy6.nyi.freebsd.org/data/latest-per-pkg/lzo2/2.10_1/120amd64-default.log
or mine with CPUTYPE https://reviews.freebsd.org/P325

> for python36:
> https://cloud.zyxst.net/~john/FreeBSD/ports/buildfailures/python36-3.6.9.log

Compare with http://beefy6.nyi.freebsd.org/data/latest-per-pkg/python36/3.6.9/120amd64-default.log
or mine with CPUTYPE https://reviews.freebsd.org/P324

> both of these will build if CPUTYPE?= is commented out
[...]
> #### /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/12R-bastion-make.conf ####
> OPTIONS_UNSET+=DEBUG 
> OPTIONS_SET+=OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS
> OPTIONS_SET+=ICONV
> CPUTYPE?=btver1
> USE_LOCALE=en_GB.UTF-8
> LICENSES_ACCEPTED+=GPLv2+ MSPAT
> WITH_CCACHE_BUILD=yes
> CCACHE_DIR=/root/.ccache
> NO_CCACHE_DEPEND=1
> CCACHE_WRAPPER_PATH=	/ccache/libexec/ccache

Can you try with *CCACHE* stuff commented out?