From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jun 26 15:25:41 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA09631 for current-outgoing; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 15:25:41 -0700 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA09621 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 15:25:38 -0700 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with ESMTP id PAA05572; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 15:25:33 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id PAA17617; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 15:26:00 -0700 Message-Id: <199506262226.PAA17617@corbin.Root.COM> To: John Capo cc: tom@uniserve.com (Tom Samplonius), freebsd-current@freefall.cdrom.com (freebsd-current) Subject: Re: mb_map full with GATEWAY and maxusers 64! In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 26 Jun 95 15:35:36 EDT." <199506261935.PAA12035@irbs.irbs.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 15:25:58 -0700 Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >I agree with Tom here. But, it seems to me that there is an >underlying problem of some sort. Why do I have to allow for 4Megs >of mbuf clusters to service some unknown transient event. Once >this memory is in the mbuf map, its there forever. Well, the usage is a function of the number of TCP connections. If you do a "netstat" and find a whole pile of connections (even ones in a closing state), then this explains it. This can easily happen to people using HTTP. >Is this a valid way to examine a running kernel? It appears that >it is. I suppose, but "netstat -m" should provide you with enough information. -DG