From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 08:26:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA15216A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:26:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E9A43D49 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:26:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aaron.glenn@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so444104rng for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:26:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=etK/EBC/uzK5uw8wLh6KUkbWxAtCSmRFmM29mT1t7V3iK0Ck9BjLvuJMkonBP/E9zcFuo7bqlHplOb8J9MutM4yb4RvGxDkORADMuabTMUuOZjsoDsxt3qKLcgpd8FvL1kD5KKhh+Jw/9zdOUv63HJQUCuMdKSULc2j2YtC+iXk= Received: by 10.38.59.80 with SMTP id h80mr321062rna; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:26:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.151.63 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 00:26:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <18f601940412080026ee1d85c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 00:26:03 -0800 From: Aaron Glenn To: Justin Hopper In-Reply-To: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple IPs in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Aaron Glenn List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:26:05 -0000 On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:23:24 -0800, Justin Hopper wrote: > Two questions: > > 1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails > binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon? Someone hasn't read up on 5.x... > 2) Has anyone used Pawel's multiple IP patch in a semi-production > environment? Can anyone report any problems or issues that they've had > with it? I toyed with it at home without a single issue. Still, in a hosting environment I'd use 5.x Regards, aaron.glenn