From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jul 21 17:19:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA22084 for current-outgoing; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 17:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell.uniserve.com (tom@shell.uniserve.com [204.244.210.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA22077 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 17:19:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tom@localhost) by shell.uniserve.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA13841; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 17:18:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shell.uniserve.com: tom owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 17:18:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom To: "Christopher T. Johnson" cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , sef@Kithrup.COM, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I am contemplating the following change... In-Reply-To: <199707212348.TAA26766@NetGSI.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 21 Jul 1997, Christopher T. Johnson wrote: > Having installed FreeBSD on 7 machines in the last 2 months, the one > thing that all the NICs had in common was IRQ 10, IO 0x300. > > Every one had to be opened up and the NIC reset to use IRQ 5, IO 0x280 > to match the FreeBSD defaults. It would have been easier to use the visual configuration tool on the boot floppy to change ed0, rather that tearing apart the systems. This is what I do. > I would be perfectly happy if ed1 came up as IRQ 10, IO 0x300 which should > allow both groups to be happy. > > Chris > > Tom