From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Aug 16 10:40: 8 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7609137B400
	for <freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECD343E42
	for <freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g7GHe3JU037908
	for <freebsd-ports@freefall.freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g7GHe3MF037907;
	Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200208161740.g7GHe3MF037907@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
Subject: Re: ports/41710: [port]  lame update (fix CFLAGS)
Reply-To: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/41710; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
To: lioux@FreeBSD.org
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ports/41710: [port]  lame update (fix CFLAGS)
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:44:25 +0200 (CEST)

 In article <200208161520.g7GFK3Cq017168@freefall.freebsd.org> you write:
 
 >  	What about making patch optional? I mean,
 >  if the user adds WITH_OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS, this patch is not applied.
 >  Otherwise, it is applied per default.
 
 What's the gain?  The whole point of making a port honor CFLAGS is
 that users can set them at their convenience.  If somebody wants
 to build lame with super-duper optimization flags, they can just
 do so with
 
 $ CFLAGS="-O1000 -mfoo -fbar" make build
 
 (Personally, I'd go for something like CC=ccc CFLAGS=-fast.)
 
 >  	Check audio/liba52/Makefile for an example.
 
 Truly pointless, IMO.
 
 -- 
 Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message