Date: 18 Jul 2003 11:44:23 -0700 From: LLeweLLyn Reese <llewelly@lifesupport.shutdown.com> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc-3.3 issues Message-ID: <x3r84nptdk.fsf@lifesupport.shutdown.com> In-Reply-To: <20030718172335.GA70231@madman.celabo.org> References: <1058366903.81198.18.camel@skeeve> <20030718153358.GC67855@madman.celabo.org> <20030718113753.080b442d.ak03@gte.com> <200307181812.18604.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <20030718172335.GA70231@madman.celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@freebsd.org> writes: > [For some reason I haven't seen Alexander's post yet, so I'm mixing > replies here.] > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:12:10PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > On Friday 18 July 2003 17:37, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > > On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:33:58 -0500 > > > > > > "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > > I also recall lots of missing `typename's in the system headers that > > > > were resolved in the actual GCC distribution. > > > > > > > > Alexander, do the STL headers et. al. get updated with the rest of the > > > > compiler chain? > > > > > > Yes. But libstdc++ itself lags a bit behind GCC features. The reason why > > > GCC ports are not reporting any errors is because by default GCC > > > suppresses warnings from system headers, and C++ headers are considered > > > system. We disable this suppression in imported compiler. [snip] Curiosity: Why does this suppression get disabled in the imported compiler?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?x3r84nptdk.fsf>