Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 22:15:37 +0000 From: Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk> To: Kevin K <ksk3@hotmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup question Message-ID: <20000316221537.E10813@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20000316060538.95353.qmail@hotmail.com> References: <20000316060538.95353.qmail@hotmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kevin K wrote: > If I don't want to cvsup past 3.4 STABLE, would I use: > RELENG_3_4_STABLE ? > > I tried this and it didn't work out they way I had hoped. I only want to do > this to avoid the Release Candidate portion of 3.5 (when it comes out). I don't really think you can do that. The branch is just 3-STABLE really, with the CVS tag "RELENG_3", and its version number just happens to be 3.4 at the moment. If you don't want to use 3.5-RC, just don't cvsup once it comes out. Resume your cvsupping after 3.5 is released to get 3.5-STABLE if you want. Why don't you want to use 3.5-RC though? IME, -RC is no worse than -STABLE; it just has a different name (if anything, it should be better than the -STABLE before it in the same way that -STABLE is better than the previous -STABLE, etc). My two servers at home have been up for 58 days on 3.4-RC, only brought down then by a brief power cut, so I don't think it's all that bad. -- Ben Smithurst / ben@scientia.demon.co.uk / PGP: 0x99392F7D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000316221537.E10813>