From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Apr 20 10:31:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from dehumanizer.meganet.pt (hyperion.meganet.pt [194.38.131.251]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A4837B43C for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:31:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from deh@meganet.pt) Received: from dehumanizer.meganet.pt (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by dehumanizer.meganet.pt (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D4E91F1F2 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 18:25:11 +0100 (WEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Pedro Timoteo Organization: OniSolutions To: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: top uptime! Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 18:25:11 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <3AE07137.5B2EB5CB@acuson.com> In-Reply-To: <3AE07137.5B2EB5CB@acuson.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0104201825111T.20864@dehumanizer.meganet.pt> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > It's very interesting to note which OS is *not* listed. I don't want to be TOO annoying, but could it be because the linux kernel 2.4 is about 4 months old, and since then most people have upgraded to it, ruining their uptimes? I'm not saying that Linux is more stable (I know it isn't, I use both), but in this case I don't think the stability of Linux is fairly shown here. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message