From owner-cvs-all Sun Aug 20 19:15:43 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E4D37B423; Sun, 20 Aug 2000 19:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA51037; Sun, 20 Aug 2000 20:15:37 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id UAA35416; Sun, 20 Aug 2000 20:14:36 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200008210214.UAA35416@harmony.village.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files src/sys/dev/bktr bktr_os.c src/sys/dev/md md.c src/sys/fs/devfs devfs.h devfs_devs.c devfs_vfsops.c devfs_vnops.c src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC src/sys/i4b/driver i4b_ctl.c i4b_rbch.c i4b_tel.c i4b_trace.c ... Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 20 Aug 2000 14:34:39 PDT." <200008202134.OAA42108@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200008202134.OAA42108@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 20:14:36 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200008202134.OAA42108@freefall.freebsd.org> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : Add devfs cloning to: : disk minilayer (ie: ad(4), sd(4), cd(4) etc etc) Why bother with sd? Shouldn't that be da? : md(4), tun(4), bpf(4), fd(4) ... : Add commented out DEVFS to GENERIC Question: Is this DEVFS interrupt context safe? The old DEVFS didn't deal well with devices arriving in an interrupt context, which CAM does. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message