Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:23:41 -0700 From: bill fumerola <billf@mu.org> To: Eivind Hestnes <eivind@stabbursmoen.no> Cc: performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance Intel Pro 1000 MT (PWLA8490MT) Message-ID: <20050419222341.GD31040@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <426573D9.8080607@stabbursmoen.no> References: <20050419183335.F18008131@joshua.stabbursmoen.no> <5c05f1805041911351d2bd98e@mail.gmail.com> <42656CA0.9040403@stabbursmoen.no> <d00578af6eff12d7aa5139bbb410a1d2@staff.openaccess.org> <426573D9.8080607@stabbursmoen.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:10:49PM +0200, Eivind Hestnes wrote: > It sounds sensible, but I have also learned that throwing hardware on a > problem is not always right.. Compared to shiny boxes from Cisco, HP > etc. a 500 Mhz router is for heavy duty networks. I would try some more > tweaking before replacing the box with some more spectular hardware. you've confused commodity CPUs with special purpose hardware. alternatively, 'heavy duty networks' is a relative term. -- bill fumerola
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050419222341.GD31040>