From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 10 18:00:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FEFC16A418 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:00:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C67913C448 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.72.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F34405BAD; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:59:59 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47AF3B98.7060901@bsdforen.de> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:59:52 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080205) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "E. J. Cerejo" References: <47ADE033.7070402@optonline.net> <47ADE2EC.2030906@infracaninophile.co.uk> <47ADEAD2.2030803@bsdforen.de> <200802092346.23078.ejcerejo@optonline.net> <47AEF9B5.10509@onetel.com> <20080210084035.551b9acf@scorpio> <47AF16F8.3040109@optonline.net> <20080210122358.4dc52efd@scorpio> <47AF389E.2010909@optonline.net> In-Reply-To: <47AF389E.2010909@optonline.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libicui18n.so.36 not found, required by "evolution" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:00:09 -0000 E. J. Cerejo wrote: > Gerard wrote: >> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500 >> "E. J. Cerejo" wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>> Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade? >>> >> >> Yes, I use it all the time. >> >> >>> Why has the ports tree be up to date? >>> >> >> What conceivable reason would you have for using an outdated ports tree? >> >> >>> Will portmanager download anything from the cvsup repos? >>> >> >> It will only fetch programs that need updating, just like portupgrade. >> >> Would you be so kind as to explain your reluctance to update your >> system? The number of potential programs that need updating seems >> rather immaterial when compared to the potential system wide >> improvement in its overall performance. You could simply start the >> upgrade in the evening when you are through using the PC. Depending on >> the speed of your machine, it might very well be done by the next >> morning, if not sooner. >> > My system was updated yesterday and I'm trying to resolve the issues > that arose from the updating. I can't update my system everyday I just > don't have time for it. If you don't want to rebuild the stuff, just add libicui18n.so.36 libicui18n.so to your /etc/libmap.conf file. This solution works if no functions have been removed from the library interface, which only very rarely happens.