From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 30 00:23:19 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB631065672;
	Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de)
Received: from gilb.zs64.net (gilb.zs64.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:105e::1ea])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD83C8FC12;
	Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:23:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gilb.zs64.net (Postfix, from stb@lassitu.de) id 0E16511215B;
	Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:23:18 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>
In-Reply-To: <7A8E7854-4696-44B9-B0BE-3D6640BA0A49@lassitu.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 01:23:17 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7EAD98F7-FDB6-404B-82FE-8D5BC081BD9B@lassitu.de>
References: <CAJ-Vmon8+OXQ4g752zZEB-O0BR0sFWO0QUvw--xp2jsBDkx6tQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<0F6CC18F-6973-42A2-AC03-F01BF59458AE@lassitu.de>
	<CAJ-Vmo=Y8pp4iFnw+1hcPae6QXFboz=a7puwgC1kVSZ3JwMgPQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1100F70E-9DA9-4163-AC9A-423ECE5AA9A3@lassitu.de>
	<CAJ-VmonrnJ7cC6u2LsL9AGusz_+kSwY62Rr1__sg5U_NynJ1SQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-Vmo=WSN1oLM=B2HqSHrWyOaOD9BSwwu8=1Wys0CLRJ_N-TA@mail.gmail.com>
	<C637C171-A1A2-4296-84FA-6DE97137DC42@lassitu.de>
	<CAJ-Vmon2boy7OCh_4O0MeCi0yCdZu0OYb5dxHCEK=-+46zBGtg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-Vmoku5eLEYi5_DXVxK=0=4Ewn2aGepv3YUw4ApuVh_7y2+w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-VmonvpnaS1rAO+sDRh1E5WfsrZTYE297Kc96prhfKjrM89Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-VmokQxQs2DUKL=ONyxnnS7Q28ytmwZJ_thqvc4SvMkmS=cQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<18CABB46-9B9A-41CB-8742-6723C5FF4D67@lassitu.de>
	<C0BF20FD-E30F-4E9C-A0FE-500BE4807B99@bsdimp.com>
	<CAJ-VmokgiQCEG4et3X=3o_MuCMkO9MqkKqa-fjdpEqQNucn=Lw@mail.gmail.com>
	<2CBD8651-E132-49DC-A082-37A8F5C626EA@bsdimp.com>
	<AFE755D6-E462-40B4-A97B-9261303B3A4F@lassitu.de> <CAJ-Vm
	onmMASxJZBAd2doX4eV6s5TF-3kCB0pLSMrWM8r0UsCmg@mail.gmail.com>
	<FC8A0B08-5292-44CC-AEC0-08BF170FCEA4@lassitu.de>
	<267FB3D6-830E-4A2F-8C1C-A96873EDCD31@lassitu.de>
	<EC4D4397-FA60-4CB1-8635-48988215E19A@lassitu.de>
	<CAJ-VmomZeHEyue4eaNGm+w67uDBsOH_2bqocXjBGxyxHXStZ_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<12538AED-175C-4B1E-BF05-6FD05D14CE70@lassitu.de>
	<CAJ-Vmonu_HyhEnS=3aj7X41-LPWcihPA6Wa6jgV3cn7im2N3Kg@mail.gmail.com>
	<2135AD2B-76D4-4B3D-A009-8F3BEC836051@lassitu.de>
	<CAJ-VmomkCLARagMXUmmJ2O8AQsiKwOEvWMLmwUnK=c47yDJvyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<2BB71545-7DE9-493D-92FE-AD4CEDCBF2D1@lassitu.de>
	<E4D24E02-4F0E-43FB-84F0-F5F20925F748@lassitu.de>
	<7A8E7854-4696-44B9-B0BE-3D6640BA0A49@lassitu.de>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: "freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org" <freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Updated switch/glue patch?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems <freebsd-embedded.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-embedded>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-embedded-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-embedded>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-embedded-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-embedded>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-embedded-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:23:19 -0000

Am 29.12.2011 um 17:56 schrieb Stefan Bethke:

> Am 29.12.2011 um 11:18 schrieb Stefan Bethke:
>=20
>> http://gitorious.org/~stb/freebsd/stb-adrianchadd-freebsd-work =
(branch work/ath)
>> http://www.lassitu.de/freebsd/etherswitch-adrian.patch (patch against =
Adrians gitorious repo as of now)
>> http://www.lassitu.de/freebsd/etherswitch.tbz (all files)
>=20
> With this version, I get no WITNESS warnings, nor panics from the =
callout.
> The retries for I2C select and PHY register access always succeed =
(100k+
> test accesses in a tight loop).

All the retries are probably bogus.  I've switched back to the original =
version of iicbb.c, and I'm not getting a single retry on either select =
or PHY register access.

I'll look into why my improved code is working worse than the original, =
but for the time being, we should stick to the original code.  The =
recovery options in rtl8366rb.c don't really hurt and can stay for the =
moment.


Stefan

--=20
Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>   Fon +49 151 14070811