From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 25 18:44:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75A4106564A for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcelbonnet@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4208FC18 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so1879708obb.13 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:44:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=SUpkY3nb9eygiE+1FXev9mvk2DwPrv+pO4zNN+CvM80=; b=tycGK6Og1kaMzY18Gm8JhcHB4lZOnPkIDv3dGzvOha/1nAx2JfjeL/6HHE4qQ9Ftis Xh6halYGt6e69W43IJR+ODasYN6p/P/7Ys8+0QlNdLT0uSHppzrsnXfnnKXtkzChSTsn aCwmU2qkAQcKSz+/gVtPzlsnsJxDfE1ADy9zIh9JJmpEo1R/DHpUCLZ3Z1aT5f5E3pAb Kl/jSTdbImVKTaB+YuYQvF/UMH/Bw2JKCMuiG4ODTM1OmfVLVTwg+xJLmAJ6KHAXSykb 5UeEOVVDhPYO/Fr105qKposz9UCYXVIxs3/MYFO/VwSWUd9OM49vjdhTt9h4O490tEAM ExVg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.149.105 with SMTP id tz9mr37022295obb.65.1343241885046; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:44:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.15.166 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:44:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3F4A33A2FC134615A5DC7A7E455AA177@white> References: <1884361371.20120329121344@serebryakov.spb.ru> <3F4A33A2FC134615A5DC7A7E455AA177@white> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:44:44 -0300 Message-ID: From: Marcel Bonnet To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: What is actual status of SUJ in 9-STABLE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:44:45 -0000 On 29 March 2012 05:29, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > Use of SU+J & use with snapshots is being addressed. Latest update (to 9.0 > Stable) was today, please refer to > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable-9/2012-March/001406.html > > If you mean to use it in production (ie with snapshots), then it is not > advisable. > Regards, Dewayne. > Does anyone knows if we have news about that? Have we got a new state, like working and nice for production ? Thanks, -- Marcel Bonnet