Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:17:36 +0100
From:      michael.grunewald@laposte.net (=?iso-8859-15?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?=)
To:        linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
Cc:        =?iso-8859-15?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= <michael.grunewald@laposte.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Reviving a dead port
Message-ID:  <86y7ddw1gf.fsf@Llea.celt.neu>
In-Reply-To: <20071104203508.GB30608@soaustin.net> (Mark Linimon's message of "Sun\, 4 Nov 2007 14\:35\:08 -0600")
References:  <864pg22q01.fsf@Llea.celt.neu> <20071104203508.GB30608@soaustin.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) writes:

>> Second, the port version I wrote is anachronic, since some people may
>> have 1.46 installed (or prior 1.45.5 version, but PORT_REVISION can be
>> used here so this is not an issue). What's the correct way (or least
>> annoyance way) to handle this backtime travel?
>
> See the description of PORTEPOCH in the Porter's Handbook:

Thank you for the hint.
--=20
Best wishes,
Micha=EBl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86y7ddw1gf.fsf>