Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:59:26 +0000 From: "Sainath Varanasi (Wipro Ltd.)" <v-savar@microsoft.com> To: "bug-followup@FreeBSD.org" <bug-followup@FreeBSD.org> Cc: BSD Integration Components for Hyper-V <bsdic@microsoft.com>, "linimon@freebsd.org" <linimon@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: ports/182209: [new port] misc/hyperv-ic: Ports containing Hyper-V integration components for FreeBSD Message-ID: <C9C10AFAF4C8384E9A3DB9C080D18F1C0311B21F@SINEX14MBXC408.southpacific.corp.microsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20a17ca983564c5989149b6e41f8fcba@BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> References: <201309292316.r8TNGgFR070061@freefall.freebsd.org> <CAGBxaXnqJmp=tzwV7KzFMPNQGCQXQXbsRxFjU3-dqBHAqVim4A@mail.gmail.com> <20a17ca983564c5989149b6e41f8fcba@BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Please change the category from "misc" to "emulators". Do let us know if = there is anything else that needs to be done. Thanks, Sainath. From: Abhishek Gupta (LIS) Sent: 01 October 2013 02:40 To: Aryeh Friedman; linimon@freebsd.org<mailto:linimon@freebsd.org> Cc: BSD Integration Components for Hyper-V; freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org<= mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: ports/182209: [new port] misc/hyperv-ic: Ports containing Hype= r-V integration components for FreeBSD Hi, Apologies for the mistake. Ideally I like Aryeh's suggestion of creating a = category for virtualization integration components. However given that it w= ould require a lot more work, I believe emulators is the right category. Pl= ease change from misc to emulators. Thanks, Abhishek From: Aryeh Friedman [mailto:aryeh.friedman@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 5:09 PM To: linimon@freebsd.org<mailto:linimon@freebsd.org> Cc: BSD Integration Components for Hyper-V; freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org<= mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ports/182209: [new port] misc/hyperv-ic: Ports containing Hype= r-V integration components for FreeBSD General question on the category: There are a significant number of virtualization ports in emulators. Em= ulators seems to be more about emulating hardware that is not present inste= ad of virtualizing the existing hardware. Given that why not create a cate= gory for virtualization? On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 7:16 PM, <linimon@freebsd.org<mailto:linimon@freebs= d.org>> wrote: Old Synopsis: Ports containing Hyper-V integration components for FreeBSD New Synopsis: [new port] misc/hyperv-ic: Ports containing Hyper-V integrati= on components for FreeBSD State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: linimon State-Changed-When: Sun Sep 29 23:15:12 UTC 2013 State-Changed-Why: Fix synosis. Note to submitter: I have substituted 'misc' as the category. 'kld' is a virtual category and cannot be used for a primary category (e.g. there is no ports/kld/ directory.) Is there another physical category you think might be better? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D182209 _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org> maili= ng list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-bugs-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org>"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C9C10AFAF4C8384E9A3DB9C080D18F1C0311B21F>