Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 00:14:51 +0400 From: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@ipfw.ru> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r272840 - in head: sbin/ipfw sys/conf sys/modules/ipfw sys/netgraph sys/netinet sys/netpfil/ipfw Message-ID: <5A09F093-EC19-4E02-8930-224D8CC08D31@ipfw.ru> In-Reply-To: <6784482.tcpsbB2Pkh@ralph.baldwin.cx> References: <201410091932.s99JWaSc065624@svn.freebsd.org> <6784482.tcpsbB2Pkh@ralph.baldwin.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11 Oct 2014, at 20:13, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thursday, October 09, 2014 07:32:36 PM Alexander V. Chernikov = wrote: >> Author: melifaro >> Date: Thu Oct 9 19:32:35 2014 >> New Revision: 272840 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/272840 >>=20 >> Log: >> Merge projects/ipfw to HEAD. >=20 > Should it now say 'ipfw3' in dmesg instead of ipfw2? Also, should the=20= I=92m not sure all these changes are worth renaming ipfw2 to ipfw3 :) > associated filenames (ipfw2.* and ip_fw2.*) be renamed? (Perhaps back > to just ipfw.* and ip_fw.* to avoid more rototill in the future?) >=20 > --=20 > John Baldwin >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A09F093-EC19-4E02-8930-224D8CC08D31>