Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:05:50 +0200 From: "C. P. Ghost" <cpghost@cordula.ws> To: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: rcs Message-ID: <CADGWnjUAQ9Z7As-BnHs07c47%2Bzic%2BL120OdPovS1PD1P3Ge57g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <77307DF8-637D-4295-BF47-8742F1552CE8@orthanc.ca> References: <77307DF8-637D-4295-BF47-8742F1552CE8@orthanc.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> wrote: > Okay folks, can we make a call about keeping the RCS tools in the base? > > The proponents wanting to remove RCS need to speak up and make their > technical case. > Still using RCS here and there, esp. managing /etc. Having to install it separately on machines that are not or seldom connected would be a pain. On a more general note: *if* you absolutely have to kill functionality and move it into ports, please do create a ports/freebsd category, and move to it stuff like net/freebsd-uucp etc... This way, all code that was previously in /usr/src would be availabel at one place. Thanks, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADGWnjUAQ9Z7As-BnHs07c47%2Bzic%2BL120OdPovS1PD1P3Ge57g>