Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:00:35 -0600
From:      Jon Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu>
To:        Kenneth Culver <culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz>
Cc:        Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
Subject:   Re: poor gigabit ethernet performance with amd64 + sk0
Message-ID:  <406461B3.1090805@alumni.rice.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20040326112153.wcgwk4o0wkwwosos@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz>
References:  <20040325220939.2ogcsoogkoookwwc@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> <20040326153548.GD3446@dan.emsphone.com> <20040326112153.wcgwk4o0wkwwosos@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/26/2004 10:21 AM, Kenneth Culver wrote:
> Quoting Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>:
>> In the last episode (Mar 25), Kenneth Culver said:
>>> I recently did a short file transfer over gigabit ethernet in both
>>> x86 and amd64. On x86 it appears the limiting factor is the laptop
>>> I'm transferring to. I get about 20MB/sec to the laptop in x86. But
>>> on amd64, I'm not sure what the limiting factor is, because I max out
>>> at about 2.8MB/sec with the EXACT same hardware. Here are the dmesg
>>> lines for that ethernet card:
>>
>> Make sure you're testing ethernet speeds and not disk speeds; try
>> something like ttcp or tcpblast.  Even a pII/600mhz can do 50MB/sec;
>> any modern CPU should be able to do 90.  You might also want to do a
>> long test, then run systat -v to see if the CPU load or interrupts/sec
>> is different between x86 and amd64 modes.
> 
> I know for sure I'm not testing disk speeds, at least on the x86 side. 
> In x86
> the transfer at 20MB/sec is maxing out my laptop's hard drive. I have 
> the same
> model hard drive running my amd64 -CURRENT as I do my x86 -CURRENT, and 
> both
> kernels were built from the same source tree. The only difference I see 
> when
> running the tests with systat -vm 1 is that sk0 is only interrupting around
> 600-800 times per second on amd64, where it's interrupting at like 4000 
> times
> per second on x86, which is what I'd expect given that on FreeBSD-x86 I'm
> sending data at 10x the speed of FreeBSD-amd64.
> 
> One other thing I noticed while doing the systat -vm 1 was that the clk 
> device
> is interrupting at over 1000 times per second instead of the x86'x 100 
> times
> per second. I could try changing that to 100 and see what happens. Also I'm
> read a little bit in the NOTES file on amd64 that atpic is for legacy 8259A
> interrupt controller support. I don't think I need that either. Could 
> any of
> these be causing my problem?

HZ=1024 by default on amd64, so you should be seeing approximately that 
many clk interrupts/second.

Jon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?406461B3.1090805>