From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 9 19:19:10 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46FA16A418 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2007 19:19:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbowie@buzmo.com) Received: from smtp1.dfw.fabriclabs.com (smtp1.dfw.fabriclabs.com [69.12.11.77]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABC513C428 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2007 19:19:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbowie@buzmo.com) Received: from mickey.la.buzmo.com (nat.strongaero.com [64.81.41.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.dfw.fabriclabs.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l89JIdGk026766; Sun, 9 Sep 2007 14:18:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mbowie@buzmo.com) Message-ID: <46E446A4.8090305@buzmo.com> Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 12:16:52 -0700 From: Mike Bowie User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070530) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Lewis References: <46E308C1.8040501@buzmo.com> <20070909.114656.104027741.ken@tydfam.jp> <46E38E90.5090606@buzmo.com> <20070909.183337.115905635.ken@tydfam.jp> <46E413CE.5050209@buzmo.com> <20070909191227.GA12241@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20070909191227.GA12241@misty.eyesbeyond.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: eclipse 3.3.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 19:19:11 -0000 Greg, Sounds good to me... I was going to ask at what point that might be feasible. It might drum up a bit of feedback, which couldn't hurt. I'm guessing someone out there has commit access to the ports tree ;-) Cheers, Mike. Greg Lewis wrote: > On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 08:39:58AM -0700, Mike Bowie wrote: > >> Ken Yamada wrote: >> >>> Opps! >>> >>> You missed ${WRKSRC} in ${CP}. >>> It needs to be ; >>> >>> do-build: >>> @(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} \ >>> ./build -os ${ECLIPSE_OS} -ws ${ECLIPSE_WS} -arch ${ECLIPSE_ARCH} >>> -comp >>> ilelibs) >>> @${CP} >>> ${WRKSRC}/launchertmp/library/${ECLIPSE_WS}/eclipse_1017a.so \ >>> ${WRKSRC}/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.${ECLIPSE_WS}.${ECLIPSE_OS}.${ECLIPSE_ARCH}_1.0.0.v20070606 >>> >>> Yes, it works - better than I thought..., but, we may better tailor >>> build.xml further before committing as a port so that we can port next >>> version easier... >>> >> Ah yes! That's what I get for rushing through! >> >> http://www.buzmo.com/projects/eclipse-europa-port/Makefile-090907.diff >> has said fix included. (Ironically enough, made manually to the diff >> and untested... will I never learn?!?) >> >> And you're right on your second point too, it does work very well. >> > > Sounds like its good enough to at least commit to eclipse-devel? > >