Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 01:40:22 +1000 From: Rob B <rbyrnes@ozemail.com.au> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommended MTA Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20011026013819.00a832d0@pop.ozemail.com.au> In-Reply-To: <x7hesnzrv0.fsf@onceler.kciLink.com> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011025045848.02152ec0@pop.ozemail.com.au> <20011023173359.K7014@ns2.wananchi.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20011025045848.02152ec0@pop.ozemail.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:01 26/10/2001, you muttered something like: >RB> I've use both Postfix and Exim, and I've stuck with Postfix because I >RB> found it simpler and faster to configure. > >which one gave you faster mail delivery outbound? if you don't have >numbers, what was your impression on their relative speeds? On my little P166 under Linux (Debian 2.2r3), I can't tell the difference. I suppose that one would start noticing the speed (performance) of an MTA under load. There was a comparison of MTA's done by someone ... I'll hunt around and see if I have it archived Rob -- Small change can often be found under seat cushions. [[15210.1 km (9451.1 mi), 123.9 deg] (Apparent) Rennerian This is random quote 868 of a collection of 1166 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.2.20011026013819.00a832d0>