From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 09:11:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2B316A4CE for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:11:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp2.server.rpi.edu (smtp2.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592EC43D70 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:11:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp2.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2MHBKEw020250; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:11:20 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040322120916.GA9002@psconsult.nl> References: <20040322120916.GA9002@psconsult.nl> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:11:19 -0500 To: Paul Schenkeveld From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PATCH for a more-POSIX `ps', and related adventures X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:11:21 -0000 At 1:09 PM +0100 3/22/04, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: > >On Sat, Mar 20, 2004, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > [this is BCC'ed to -arch so more people have a chance to see it, but >> I expect most of the discussion to happen in freebsd-standards]. >> > > ... > >Any chance this can be adapted for RELENG_4 or do you think the >ps source has changed too much between RELENG_4 and HEAD? I intend to MFC at least some of it. I will avoid anything that would change how something currently works in 4.x, but I hope to add some of the "new features". >Of course I tried a quick patch using 4.9-STABLE sources but most >chunks failed. A patch and make using HEAD sources showes too many >#include differences. You're seeing those due to a few previous updates which were not MFC'ed. When I did a quick skim of those, most of those seemed to be cosmetic. Again, I don't intend to MFC anything that changes the behavior of 'ps', but I'll see what I can do about cosmetic (aka style(9)) changes. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu