Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 17:22:24 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230888] Missing 64 bit atomic functions for i386 Message-ID: <bug-230888-29464-PX2GD1tetL@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-230888-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-230888-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230888 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to David Chisnall from comment #3) Seems like a C lock implementation for large types is allowed to place the = lock in the shared memory with the object. (Not that using shared memory or _At= omic structs is necessarily a good idea.) "The size, representation, and alignment of an atomic type need not be the = same as those of the corresponding unqualified type." --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-230888-29464-PX2GD1tetL>