From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  9 00:52:42 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F57116A41C
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Jun 2005 00:52:42 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from lists@natserv.com)
Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA44A43D48
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Jun 2005 00:52:41 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from lists@natserv.com)
Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147])
	by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j590qe5p016502;
	Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:52:40 -0400
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:52:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com>
X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050608233027.GA94104@xor.obsecurity.org>
Message-ID: <20050608203207.X12338@zoraida.natserv.net>
References: <20050608165110.O11353@zoraida.natserv.net>
	<20050608233027.GA94104@xor.obsecurity.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Ocaml or Unison port working for anyone?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 00:52:42 -0000

On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:

>> Why do some ports require i386? Instructions not supported by gcc in
>> AMD64?
>
> Non-portable assumptions in the code (e.g. sizeof(void *) == sizeof(int))

I had never looked at those error logs before but it seemed like the port 
compiled and there were errors deleting some files. Since I could not 
find any build errors tried to look at other report logs to see how 
errors look, but the handfull I tried none had logs. :-(


> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org.

I was looking at the "by error type vs build environment". How often is 
that run? The date on top was from late May.

Also on the "last run 5.X" many of the ports don't have any logs. What 
does that mean? At first I thought maybe it meant they compiled ok, but looking 
for ports I have compiled, none was found so the complete list seems like 
it's broken ports.