Date: Tue, 01 Jul 1997 09:28:28 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> Cc: Holm Tiffe <freebsd@magnet.geophysik.tu-freiberg.de>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quad ints implemented ? Message-ID: <E0wj4qy-00069K-00@rover.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 01 Jul 1997 18:17:15 %2B1000." <Pine.BSF.3.91.970701181651.869J-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> References: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970701181651.869J-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.91.970701181651.869J-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> "Daniel O'Callaghan" writes: : > I've tried to get postgreSQL V6.1 working with the int8 package on -current. : > It seems that FreeBSD has not jet fully implemented the 64bit int in the : > stdio library, %q is not documented. It works for printf(3), but scanf fails. : : Yes, I've noticed this, too. I've also noticed that things liked %lld and %llu don't work on FreeBSD. This is from code ported from Solaris. Waht, if anything, does the standard have to say on this? And would people object if I implemented %ll as a long long modifier? Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0wj4qy-00069K-00>