Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 01:53:43 +1000 From: Rob B <rbyrnes@ozemail.com.au> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommended MTA Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20011026015139.020dde30@pop.ozemail.com.au> In-Reply-To: <x7hesnzrv0.fsf@onceler.kciLink.com> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011025045848.02152ec0@pop.ozemail.com.au> <20011023173359.K7014@ns2.wananchi.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20011025045848.02152ec0@pop.ozemail.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:01 26/10/2001, you muttered something like: > >>>>> "RB" == Rob B <Rob> writes: > >RB> I've use both Postfix and Exim, and I've stuck with Postfix because I >RB> found it simpler and faster to configure. > >which one gave you faster mail delivery outbound? if you don't have >numbers, what was your impression on their relative speeds? I can't remember if this popped up on the Exim or Postfix mailing lists, but here is a comparison of MTA' performance at http://www.kyoto.wide.ad.jp/mta/eval1/eindex.html There is another by Dan Shearer at http://shearer.org/en/writing/mtacomparison.html (incomplete) and one more http://www.geocities.com/mailsoftware42/ Cheers, Rob -- I came, I saw, she conquered. [[15210.1 km (9451.1 mi), 123.9 deg] (Apparent) Rennerian This is random quote 480 of a collection of 1166 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.2.20011026015139.020dde30>