From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 16:47:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFAE16A41F for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:47:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE36643D62 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:47:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A971CD12DC for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:47:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:47:22 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: I7QFPUK4Um+S0ZTTGoVxX+YKRtfEuThTU/kcxQEdP76z 1129826841 Received: from gumby.localdomain (88-104-194-252.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.104.194.252]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF06570147 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:47:21 -0400 (EDT) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:46:53 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <1129818347.11012.8.camel@localhost> <200510201606.44110.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <1129822535.11012.21.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1129822535.11012.21.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510201746.57879.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: A simple ports question... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:47:24 -0000 On Thursday 20 October 2005 16:35, makisupa wrote: > Thanks for the reply... > > My ports tree is up to date -- i believe the "problem" (if you want to > call it that) is that I installed gnome 2.12 from package at marcuscom > (on a 6.0 RC1 system -- i needed 6.0 for some HW issues). I therefore > have newer versions of certain files than many of the ports in the > current tree are expecting. Does this sound like a reasonable > explanation? Not entirely. FreeBSD releases all share the same ports tree, and neither gnome 2.12 nor glib-2.8.3 are in it. It sounds like you picked up a work-in-progress, development version of Gnome rather than simply the current version built against a 6.0 based system > Your answer is the one everyone has been telling me for the last week. > And i truly appreciate the response. I keep thinking i'm asking the > question wrong :) I would understand this answer if the dependencies i > had were OLDER than what the port was looking for...but I have a NEWER > version. For example, while installing pan2 it needs glib-2.6.6. I > have glib-2.8.3. How can i properly get this port installed? It really depend why you got packages for 2.12 rather than the current ports version. If gnome 2.10.2. is broken on 6.0-RC1, then it's going to be tricky. The fact that make install in the pan2 directory causes glib to build suggest that some port isn't compatible with glib-2.8.3. On the other hand if you simply got the 2.12 version because it was there, I would suggest removing it and installing 2.10.2 - presumably pointyhat has a compatible version. Alternately portmanager will probably be able to handle the reversion through the port system. You also have the options of waiting for 2.12 to hit the ports tree, or doing without gnome. Forcing the glib-2.6.6 registration will overwrite the glib-2.8.3 version which may break gnome.