From owner-freebsd-smp  Mon Apr 28 20:02:04 1997
Return-Path: <owner-smp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA18809
          for smp-outgoing; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 20:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA18801
          for <FreeBSD-SMP@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 20:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.5/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id DAA05849; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 03:00:50 GMT
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 12:00:49 +0900 (JST)
From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
cc: FreeBSD-SMP@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: SMP
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970428210516.21427B-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970429115554.5813A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-smp@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 28 Apr 1997, Narvi wrote:

> Couldn't we divide the kernel (and anything "provided" by it into) two (at
> least initially):
> 
> 1) client - accepts syscalls, translates, etc. and passes the result on to
>    2
> 2) kernel server - does all the low level stuff

We want SMP.

Mike Hancock