Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:57:49 +0000 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_opie pam_opie.c Message-ID: <200201191757.g0JHvnt23034@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: <20020119174803.GH11604@nagual.pp.ru> ; from "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> "Sat, 19 Jan 2002 20:48:03 %2B0300." References: <20020119174803.GH11604@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 17:40:43 +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > > > > No. I object on the grounds that this code is worse than the old. Agreed > > that the old code could do with some improvements, but the improvements > > are built from that old base, not the current code. > > It can't be worse. It reveals OPIE users exact in the same way, as new > one. If nobody comes with improvement, there is no sense to keep old > broken code waiting forever for something... Fixing the "old" random prompts is easy with the "old" code. To fix it with the current code means that we start by restoring the old code, and trivially modifying it. M -- o Mark Murray \_ FreeBSD Services Limited O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200201191757.g0JHvnt23034>