Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 17:58:22 -0400 From: Nathan Dorfman <nathan@rtfm.net> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is xtend in the base system? Message-ID: <19980420175822.A4615@rtfm.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980420161931.523T-100000@sasami.jurai.net>; from Matthew N. Dodd on Mon, Apr 20, 1998 at 04:20:22PM -0400 References: <19980420155034.A4214@rtfm.net> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980420161931.523T-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 20, 1998 at 04:20:22PM -0400, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > On Mon, 20 Apr 1998, Nathan Dorfman wrote: > > Why is xtend in the base system, anyway? It's definitely not > > essential, AFAICS. Maybe it should be moved into ports? > > Because it uses kernel drivers and would be prone to getting crufty if it > wasn't in the base. Why can't this be done as an lkm that is installed from a port/package? > Leave it be, I actually want to play with X10 at some point. Yeah, if I could find whatever hw I needed for it, controlling my house from my computer would be great. Unless, of course, it was a Linux box. Yikes. ;) Please don't Cc: me when replying to the list, I get the same message twice (mutt will stop doing this if you define the list using :lists and then use the L key for list-reply). > /* > Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life > winter@jurai.net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to > http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53 > */ > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message -- gotcha! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980420175822.A4615>