Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:49:02 +0100 From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: Frank Bonnet <f.bonnet@esiee.fr> Subject: Re: Image Programs Message-ID: <200812051149.03304.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <20081205113411.f202b11c.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <592613.67715.qm@web52209.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <4938C38B.8080008@esiee.fr> <20081205113411.f202b11c.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 05 December 2008 11:34:11 Polytropon wrote: > Furthermore, there's Krita, if you're already using KDE. Yep, it's getting more stable and is more intuitive for a novice/casual user then gimp, also less powerful, but that's a matter of time. > For automated image manipulations, ImageMagick and especially > its convert command are very useful and powerful (!) tools. > > What about Inkscape? Tried this one? It's more 'Illustrator'. Allthough there's a lot of overlap between the programs, it's focus lies on compositing rather then editing images. Also, it uses ImageMagick, which I personally dislike for the reasons mentioned here: http://www.graphicsmagick.org/ -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812051149.03304.fbsd.questions>