From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Jul 10 17:17:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B88537B614; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:17:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:17:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman X-Sender: green@green.dyndns.org To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel printf %i? In-Reply-To: <20000710150556.I25571@fw.wintelcom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > any objections: Can you give me a good reason for it? To act like the libc printf() isn't a good reason, I mean do you think it will actually help anyone in ways that %d doesn't? Are you noticing tons of submissions of kernel code that have %i and don't work correctly or something? I just don't get it :-/ > -- > -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] > "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message