From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 15 10:50:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33A1BED; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:50:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A777138F; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:50:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:d051:3b46:4a53:4fdc]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 57FF24AC57; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:50:24 +0400 (MSK) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:50:23 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <66408799.20130415145023@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Kimmo Paasiala Subject: Re: ipfilter(4) needs maintainer In-Reply-To: References: <20130411201805.GD76816@FreeBSD.org> <20130414160648.GD96431@in-addr.com> <36562.1365960622.5652758659450863616@ffe10.ukr.net> <201304150025.07337.Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si> <951943801.20130415141536@serebryakov.spb.ru> <195468703.20130415143237@serebryakov.spb.ru> <621849003.20130415144428@serebryakov.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Mark Martinec , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:50:26 -0000 Hello, Kimmo. You wrote 15 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8F 2013 =D0=B3., 14:47:24: KP> I'm however talking about an ftp client behind a very restrictive KP> firewall making an IPv6 connection an ftp server that uses passive KP> mode data ports that can't be known in advance. Same solution -- inspection of connections to 21 port, without any address translation. And if FTP server uses non-standard control port, yes, here is a problem, but it cannot be solved with NAT too (or your NAT/firewall should expect each and every connection for FTP commands, which is heavy and error-prone task). --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov