Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 02:16:50 +0000 From: Murray Stokely <murray@freebsd.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Handbook Acronyms Message-ID: <20040715021650.GA34256@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407141242510.26466-100000@pancho> References: <20040714131330.GE66732@hub.freebsd.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407141242510.26466-100000@pancho>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:45:30PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> Having written a number of the entries, I agree that the current entries
> are as described, and that it's nice to have them somewhere. I will
> demur somewhat about them not being relevant with the Handbook, but if
> we go that way, where else should we move them? The FAQ?
Keeping them in the Handbook is fine with me, I just think in the long
run we'll want tools that create a glossary relevant for the FAQ,
Handbook, Developers Handbook, and other documents automatically from
the same source file that you are already doing a good job
maintaining. POLA, OBE, and other mailing list acronyms aren't needed
for the Handbook, but would be good to be included at the end of an
article about the freebsd mailing lists, for example.
- Murray
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040715021650.GA34256>