Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 06:48:03 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@gmail.com> To: RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW Problems Message-ID: <cb5206420604201948k6440b8ber3656905d1047d3a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200604210056.57359.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> References: <8921D35B-1F12-4212-9B62-0CC1CC8F5AE5@allresearch.com> <4446D5A4.8030502@mykitchentable.net> <cb5206420604192114m2a07e32cx6cd706c816d6c82@mail.gmail.com> <200604210056.57359.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/21/06, RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> wrote: > On Thursday 20 April 2006 05:14, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > Yes. 'setup' is from "semi-stateful" firewall functionality while > > 'keep-state' is from fully stateful one. You can't use both in > > one rule without strange consequences. Just delete 'setup' > > words in both rules - it'll probably be fine. > > > Yes you can. When I used IPFW I did it that way and never had any problem= s. My mistake.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420604201948k6440b8ber3656905d1047d3a>