From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 11 11:59:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503FE16A420 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:59:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EB543D6A for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:59:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 18158 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2005 11:35:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) ([62.48.0.54]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Sep 2005 11:35:25 -0000 Message-ID: <43241C3A.11C24A9C@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:59:54 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: avleeuwen@gmail.com References: <200508291846.j7TIkdcM090396@repoman.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include string.h src/lib/libc/string Makefile.inc memchr.3 memmem.3 memmem.c strchr.3 strstr.3 X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:59:40 -0000 Arjan Van Leeuwen wrote: > > Hi Andre, > > On 8/29/05, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > andre 2005-08-29 18:46:39 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_6) > > include string.h > > lib/libc/string Makefile.inc memchr.3 strchr.3 strstr.3 > > Added files: (Branch: RELENG_6) > > lib/libc/string memmem.3 memmem.c > > Log: > > MFC addition of memmem(3). > > Shouldn't __FreeBSD_version be bumped for this? I'm asking because I > maintain a port that uses memmem(3), and there's now no way to > distinguish between the FreeBSD 6 installations that have memmem(3), > and the ones that don't. There are no FreeBSD 6 installations to differentiate. FreeBSD 6 is not out yet. You don't have to support FreeBSD 6 BETA or RC in the ports tree. -- Andre