From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Tue Oct 10 06:13:18 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4A6E2588E for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 06:13:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from AWilcox@Wilcox-Tech.com) Received: from mail.wilcox-tech.com (mail.wilcox-tech.com [45.32.83.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.wilcox-tech.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1E916E3CA for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 06:13:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from AWilcox@Wilcox-Tech.com) Received: (qmail 18726 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2017 06:13:09 -0000 Received: from 107-131-85-28.lightspeed.tulsok.sbcglobal.net (HELO ?192.168.1.57?) (awilcox@wilcox-tech.com@107.131.85.28) by mail.wilcox-tech.com with ESMTPA; 10 Oct 2017 06:13:09 -0000 Subject: Re: Making C++11 a hard requirement for FreeBSD To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org References: <2116882.XEKuxOb729@ralph.baldwin.cx> <20171006072010.ygq3k5ygwxykk4nb@ivaldir.net> <577d3900-76f2-2c52-8ada-b8fb1fe881be@freebsd.org> From: "A. Wilcox" Message-ID: <59DC64F1.6060706@Wilcox-Tech.com> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 01:13:05 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="o7KA1Oq4FDvHUDIr3mCQFC8s1fI1Qofdt" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 06:13:18 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --o7KA1Oq4FDvHUDIr3mCQFC8s1fI1Qofdt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/10/17 00:56, Warner Losh wrote: > (we have > good infrastructure for creating mips and arm packages today I'm told w= ould > be relatively easy to expand to new architectures). Does this include the elusive sparc64 (if qemu were fixed, and the LLVM issues resolved)? Just curious. --arw --=20 A. Wilcox (awilfox) Open-source programmer (C, C++, Python) https://code.foxkit.us/u/awilfox/ --o7KA1Oq4FDvHUDIr3mCQFC8s1fI1Qofdt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZ3GTxAAoJEMspy1GSK50U43kQALYHIUnqKJG4NbmJvvJ0SarU zegM/LW68wfu/yNyegxCxAy1hnlrkDOiHBNcL6sblMW0qwgTHU/vBGo7ifamyyie K0LUlblY/u/CRVmgG267mTFe1g4zoicOCqSKlb074NpYQx8n5FBCc5vWOqcEj5r+ 5v8VdWmF+RS5Xd9OYe0f9p1e7u0Y7GkUD7ksyMr7aTLd9PZFl1CrRv5kM+jL+k9e gXrnSLwOHoQdpajQUvlwxUF6+8Iek/EF+psheNh1LEmVWCuFL2ByNYbWeTGqLdlL QtRieJbwigD1fTEaORw2D4k0sPzPz1sditUeUZ0NYtv5sB+6IYa6m2En3EOROnbi P5Zsr8DwM4kPK0kMSTFgFQ7DLX9FmPGx7UqwSOqCnacOCXmpwoWiEPDoYHPa9kmF Y5yRXsfY4KGnHhCDB7OyKB/gdt8vRfuCdpxdN+9/5M/FQSDg5+1rLOzaXB+qQwbQ B3VvkxwBcAhiJMiLDVvZhbHgTWV5g6kW/Q8Ls2q6MA1HxEOjLWlmv82rK2Ap0pXu 3UgG4NzhDgDXD/xzoBKyY/Am0jLzZ8v/Tx3p9ay3izKM5/x8LU14jvar+EkTO8B5 PU9eZ1DNlCwADRtLRwb63Q6KJYME+CxwAkp5xBwamm9MQsmfe8r9nxR0NQa7gK8u Cm7P11xm25ufZiH0HZEs =uK2x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --o7KA1Oq4FDvHUDIr3mCQFC8s1fI1Qofdt--